Why Marxists, i.e., The Mentally Ill Think Boys Can Become Girls And Girls Can Become Boys. by Dean Gotcher

Why Marxists, i.e., The Mentally Ill Think Boys Can Become Girls And Girls Can Become Boys.
(Personal note.)

by
Dean Gotcher

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

In other words, according to Karl Marx et al. "Lust reconciles you to the world." For the Marxist, "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating is the 'drive' and the 'purpose' of life. Since all people on the face of the earth, by nature "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, anything or anyone who engenders pleasure, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" is in harmony with 'reality.' Therefore anything or anyone who inhibits or blocks pleasure, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" is 'illusionary,' i.e., is not "actual," i.e., is not to be listened to and obeyed, i.e., is "mentally ill." Since, according to Karl Marx, i.e., the Marxist, all are equal, based upon "human nature," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," all that stands in the way of 'reality,' i.e., "human nature," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" must be removed (negated) if the child to become his or her "self," i.e., to become "self actualized," not based upon what "Is," i.e., biologically the boy being a boy and the girl biologically being a girl, but what the boy or girl thinks he or she "Ought" to be. By making "Ought" "Is" (remember it is all in how you define "is"), i.e., by making the child's carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating the only basis of 'reality' the boy can believe that he is a girl and the girl can believe that she is a boy, making all things "equal" according to what all boys and girls have in common, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" (the basis of common-ism), turning reality, i.e., the boy being biologically a boy and the girl being biologically a girl into an 'illusion' and an illusion, i.e., the boy thinking he is a girl and the girl thinking she is a boy into 'reality.' This is a condition know as mentally illness, not being able to deal with reality, i.e., with what "Is."

"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was or wants to be before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), of (and now for) "self" and the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

In this way of 'reasoning,' a child riding a broomstick can turn it into (pretend it is) a horse. Fine for a child to do when he is a child, but when he grows up if he is riding a broomstick to work there is a problem, especially if he is in a position to make everyone else ride broomsticks to work as well. It we start with the child making his world, i.e., his "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" the basis of reality, then reality, i.e., the risk of working around a real horse (getting your head knocked off, walking behind it) forces you back into reality unless you make mental illness, i.e., living in a world of "ought," disregarding what "Is" the standard for what is 'real' ("actual") getting rid of ("negating") those who get in the way of 'reality,' i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous—doing so without having a guilty conscience. The road to "Utopia," i.e., the world of "ought" is paved with the bodies of those who got in the way, including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous—which is the agenda of the Marxist, i.e., the mentally ill.

With "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" being the basis of 'reality,' i.e., what is "actual," then husbands and wives become "equal," negating the husband's authority, parents and children become "equal," negating the parent's authority, teachers and the students become "equal," negating the teacher's authority, employers and the employees become "equal," negating the employer's authority, the King and "the people" become "equal," negating the King's authority, God and "the people" become "equal," negating God's authority. (It is important to note, that unlike other nations we made the citizens the parent, i.e., the King and their "representatives" the children, with the citizens, i.e., the parents, i.e., the King removing the "representative," i.e., the children from office if the children, i.e., the "representatives" did not do what the citizens, i.e., the parents, i.e., the King wanted them to do.) With this Marxist 'logic,' the Joshua tree, thinking it is a Cyprus tree can live in the swamp and the Cyprus tree, thinking it is a Joshua tree can live in the dessert since they are both "equal," i.e., both trees. Karl Marx, in his work "The Holy Family" wrote of turning different "fruit trees" into "The Fruit Tree," treating all fruit trees the same. Anyone who has or has had an orchard knows anyone thinking this way has a mental problem or has been poorly taught. When you apply Marx's "equality" formula to men, women, and children all you end us with is "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," only that which is "of the world," with men, women, and children doing unconscionable things without having a guilty conscience.

Sounding more like Karl Marx than Karl Marx himself, who was not yet born, Georg Hegel wrote:

"On account of the absolute and natural oneness of the husband, the wife, and the child [all being subject to "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," what all "the people" have in common], where there is no antithesis of person to person or of subject to object [no top-down, i.e., father's/Father's authority system], the surplus is not the property of one of them, since their indifference is not a formal or a legal one." (George Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

Therefore, what is yours, i.e., your spouse, your children, your property, your business, your soul is not yours but the collectives, since all things are "equal." According to how the Marxist thinks, they are his, since he, being mentally ill, thinks they are his. As was put into praxis in the garden in Eden, whatever the Marxist sees he owns, i.e., whatever he "lusts" after is his, turning broomsticks into 'reality,' riding (treating) you like a broomstick, i.e., as "human resource," using you for his own pleasure. Anyone not buying into (participating in and supporting him in) his 'illusion,' in his mind, is mentally ill. Marxists believe they can become whatever they "want" to be, negating anyone who points out their illusion.

"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12